Navigating the calvaria with mobile mixed reality-based neurosurgical planning: how feasible are smartphone applications as a craniotomy guide?

OBJECTIVE: Virtual simulation and imaging systems have evolved as advanced products of computing technology over the years. With advancements in mobile technology, smartphones, and tablets, the quality of display and processing speed have gradually improved, thanks to faster central processing units with higher capacity. Integrating these two technologies into the fields of healthcare and medical education has had a positive impact on surgical training. However, contemporary neurosurgical planning units are expensive and integrated neuronavigation systems in operating rooms require additional accessories. The aim of this study was to investigate the compatibility of smartphone applications in augmented reality (AR)-based craniotomy planning, which can be available even in disadvantaged workplaces with insufficient facilities. METHODS: Thirty patients diagnosed with supratentorial glial tumor and who underwent operations between January 2022 and March 2023 were included in the study. The entire stages of the surgical procedures and the surgical plans were executed with neuronavigation systems. The patient CT scans were reconstructed using software and exported as a 3D figure to an AR-enhanced smartphone application. The evaluation of the application's success was based on the spatial relationship of the AR-based artificial craniotomy to the neuronavigation-based craniotomy, with each AR-based craniotomy scaled from 0 to 3. RESULTS: In the comparison between neuronavigation-based and AR fusion-based craniotomies, 8 of 30 (26.6%) patients scored 0 and were considered failed, 6 (20%) scored 1 and were considered ineffective, 7 (23.3%) scored 2 and were considered acceptable, and 9 (30%) scored 3 and were considered favorable. CONCLUSIONS: AR technology has great potential to be a revolutionary milestone of neurosurgical planning, training, and education in the near future. In the authors' opinion, with the necessary legal permissions, there is no obstacle to the integration of surgical technological systems with mobile technology devices such as smartphones and tablets that benefit from their low-budget requirements, wide-range availability, and built-in operating systems.

Single-institution comparative analysis for odontoid resection: posterior transaxis versus anterior transnasal approach.

OBJECTIVE: The resection of an upwardly migrated odontoid is most widely performed via an anterior endoscopic endonasal approach after the addition of posterior occipitocervical instrumentation. In patients with craniovertebral junction (CVJ) anomalies like basilar invagination (BI), surgery is usually achieved in two separate stages. However, the authors have recently introduced a novel posterior transaxis approach in which all the therapeutic goals of the surgery can be safely and effectively accomplished in a single-stage procedure. The aim of the current study was to compare the widely used anterior and the recently introduced posterior approaches on the basis of objective clinical results in patients who underwent odontoid resection for BI. METHODS: Patients with BI who had undergone odontoid resection were retrospectively reviewed in two groups. The first group (n = 7) consisted of patients who underwent anterior odontoidectomy via the standard anterior transnasal route, and the second group (n = 6) included patients in whom the novel transaxis approach was performed. Patient characteristics, neurological conditions, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at admission were evaluated. Operative time, changes in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, blood loss during surgery, odontoid resection rate, postoperative complications, and mortality were compared between the patient groups. RESULTS: Data were retrospectively reviewed for 13 patients who underwent odontoid resection, posterior CVJ decompression, and occipitocervical instrumentation at the Ankara University School of Medicine Department of Neurosurgery between 2009 and 2022. In the first group (n = 7), patients who underwent anterior odontoidectomy via the standard endonasal route, two serious complications were observed, pneumocephaly and basilar artery injury. In the second group (n = 6), patients in whom the novel transaxis approach was performed, only one complication was observed, occipital plate malposition. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the results of what is to the authors' knowledge the first comparison of a novel approach with a widely used surgical approach to odontoid resection in patients with BI. The preliminary data support the successful utility of the transaxis approach for odontoid resection that meets all the operative therapeutic demands in a single-stage operation. Considering the diminished surgical risks and operative time, the transaxis approach may be regarded as a primary approach for the treatment of BI.